All contents copyright ©, Drive and Stay Alive, Inc., 2003 onwards, unless specified otherwise. All rights reserved. IMPORTANT: click here to read the DISCLAIMER |
|||||||||
|
Road Deaths in Perspective -- a Comparison with Terrorism
Excerpts from the article 'Terrorism, Transit and Safety' by Todd Litman, in the Toronto Star
July 27, 2005
|
|||||||||
|
Traffic safety researchers found that during the three months following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, shifts from air to automobile travel caused several hundred additional traffic fatalities. Had these shifts continued for more than a year, the additional deaths would have exceeded the Sept. 11 terrorist deaths. Because of actions by governments and the airline industry to increase security, travellers shifted back to air, and these excess deaths were avoided.
Terrorist attacks are intended to be highly visible, producing intense media coverage. As a result they tend to generate exaggerated fear. In most situations, traffic accidents actually represent a far greater risk.
.....It is important to avoid overreacting to terrorism in ways that increase overall risks to individuals and society. Transit terrorism would cause greater total casualties and damages if individual travellers respond to exaggerated fears by shifting from public transit to less safe modes, or if governments reduce their support for public transit.
Todd Litman is executive director of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute, an independent research organization that specializes in evaluation of transportation benefits and costs. This column summarizes the results of his recent study, Terrorism, Transit and Public Safety: Evaluating the Risks, available at http://www.vtpi.org
Source: 'Terrorism, Transit and Safety' by Todd Litman, in the Toronto Star
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|