All contents copyright ©, Drive and Stay Alive, Inc., 2003 onwards, unless specified otherwise. All rights reserved. IMPORTANT: click here to read the DISCLAIMER |
|||||||||
|
Britain Achieves Lowest Number of Road Deaths on Record
The Number of People Killed on Britain's Roads in 2004 was the Lowest Figure Since Records Began in 1926
30 June, 2005
(also see both the DSA Comments and the relevant links at the foot of the page)
|
|||||||||
|
In
2004, 3,221 people died in road accidents in Britain, down
287 or 8% on the figures from 2003 when 3,508 people were killed.
This is despite an estimated increase in road traffic of 2 per cent in
2004.
The Government has targets for reducing casualties by 2010. We want to see:
Against these targets, the figures for casualties in 2004 indicate that:
Source: Department for Transport News Release 2005/0075
DSA Comments Britain has had the hard-earned delight of being the safest developed country in the world -- in terms of per capita road death rates -- in 9 of the last 17 years (i.e. 1988-2004, inclusive) and was in a close second or occasionally third place in the other years, and this is a record that no other country can match. (See the above link for 50 countries.) Our first comment, therefore, is one of congratulations to all of those in Britain who are involved in the many areas and levels of road safety. Our second comment is one of near-astonishment, because achieving a reduction of more than 8 per cent in the number of road deaths in just one year, when the country is already at such a comparatively low death rate, is quite remarkable! It is a well known fact that once the main sources of casualty reduction, such as mandatory seatbelts and rigorous drunk-driving enforcement are in place it becomes much more difficult to achieve significant reductions in the annual death toll. Finally, to those countries -- including the USA -- that insist on merely targeting the deaths-by-total-mileage rate (more properly known as the Vehicle Miles Traveled or 'VMT' rate) we will be blunt and say: WHY? Why worry about a rate (the 'VMT') that can actually conceal an increase in the number of actual deaths even when the said rate is falling? In moral, ethical and professional terms the only good target is surely that of reducing the actual numbers of people killed and injured each year, not just paying lip service to the carnage by focusing on misleading figures. Many developed countries have set challenging targets to reduce the actual numbers of people killed each year in road crashes, and in our opinion this is the only acceptable route for such countries to take. Eddie Wren, Executive Director, Drive and Stay Alive, Inc.
Footnotes
A
fuller breakdown of road casualties for 2004 was published by the DfT today and is available
at:
Traffic in Sweden, the U.K. and the Netherlands is the Safest in the World (from SWOV, June 2004)
Drive and Stay Alive, Inc., has published a table showing the numbers of road deaths and per capita death rates for over 50 countries, for 2003 (and some for 2004). It is viewable here.
International
Road-Crash Fatality Rates, 1988-2002 (based on OECD/IRTAD
figures) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|