All contents copyright ©, Drive and Stay Alive, Inc., 2003 onwards, unless specified otherwise. All rights reserved.
IMPORTANT: click here to read the DISCLAIMER |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Rapid Advances in Active Safety Systems
27 March, 2004
Modern
vehicles are overwhelmingly better than they used to be in every way,
and not least in terms of safety. Improvements in vehicle safety have
contributed significantly to reducing road deaths and injuries and will
continue to do so. Government sees technology as a vital ally across our
transport policy, and particularly in safety issues. In
the past many of the innovations have been in the field of passive
safety. Now, however, we will see rapid advances in active safety
systems. All
manufacturers have sophisticated safety design processes and they work
together through their trade associations to develop standards usually
well ahead of any legislative process. Indeed some of these industry
standards demand changes in legislation to allow for their introduction.
Visteon, for example, has pioneered an adaptive lighting system which
cannot be introduced without such a change to regulations. Pedestrian
Safety - The European Council and Parliament have now adopted
proposals submitted by the European Commission aimed at mitigating the
severity of injuries to pedestrians. All new vehicle models will have to
pass a number of tests. In a first phase, starting in 2005, new types of
vehicles must comply with two tests concerning protection against head
and leg injuries. In a second phase, starting in 2010, four tests of
increased severity (two tests each for head and leg injuries) will be
required for new types of vehicles. These tests are based on the
recommendations of the European Enhanced Vehicle Committee (EEVC). The
European legislation acknowledges the possibility that other active
safety measures could be introduced in the future, as alternatives to
the EEVC tests. These alternative measures could be introduced,
following a feasibility assessment to be carried out by July 2004, to
see if they have at least equal protective effects to the EEVC tests.
Source: Road Safe
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|