|
Report
of the Working Group of the UK Association of Chief Police
Officers
(Personnel
and Training)
Committee
into
Pursuit Driver Training
September 1998
Contents
Foreword
by Deputy Chief Constable
Working
Party Membership
Terms
of Reference
Recommendations
Definitions
Report
Introduction
Section
One - Training
1.
Core Competencies
2.
Health and Safety
3.
Attitude
4.
Refresher Training
5.
Night Time Driver Training
6.
Harmonised Driver Training
Section
Two - Operational
7.
Controllers
8.
Pursuit Management
9.
Containment Procedures
10.
Use of Sirens and Lights
11.
Use of In-Car Video
12.
Alcohol
13.
Communication
14.
Mobile Phones
Section
Three - Technology
15.
Simulators
16.
Vehicle Conspicuity
17.
Vision Testing
18.
Stopping Devices
Section
Four - Administration
19.
Management of Police Vehicle Accidents
20.
Management of Drivers
Appendix
Revised
Risk Assessment
Bibliography
Foreword
There is an expectation from the [British] public that its Police Service will
demonstrate the highest of standards when its Officers discharge their
duties. No clearer example of this can there be than the use of Police
vehicles to detect and apprehend offenders.
The Police vehicle is a very important tool for use by Officers to fulfill
their duty and inevitably there are occasions when these vehicles must
be driven at high speeds and in a manner requiring skills which far
exceed those of the general motorist. The most emotive of such occasions
is pursuit but skilled driving is also expected during the normal course
of patrol when a Police driver can be called upon to respond urgently to
an incident.
Whatever the reason it is essential an Officer is competent and
skilled to drive a Police vehicle to exacting standards. This can only
be achieved through relevant and properly designed training. The key
must be to train officers to a standard of professionalism which enables
them to make precise judgements about their own ability and correct use
of the Police vehicle, thereby minimising risk to the public.
I am grateful to members of the Working Group for their ideas and
contributions in preparing this report. In particular, their commitment
to emphasising the importance of road safety, attitudinal training,
eyesight standards and taking maximum advantage of technological
advances.
It is crucial that members of the Police Service accept the
importance being placed on improving their driving skills and attitudes
and I hope this will also serve to reassure the public of the commitment
by the Police Service to maintaining the highest driving standards on
our roads.
Rodney Lind
Back
to Top, and Contents
WORKING GROUP MEMBERSHIP
Chair
Mr. R. P. LIND, Q.P.M., Wiltshire Constabulary
Deputy Chief Constable
Members
Inspector R. Edwards, Surrey Police
Inspector C.R. Elliott (Retired), Metropolitan Police
Miss L. Head, BSc (Hons), PSDB Sandridge
Sergeant C.J. Hill, Wiltshire Constabulary
Supt T. Hubbard (Retired), Humberside Police
Supt D.J.C. McBirney, BA (Hons), Thames Valley Police
Supt D.J. McGarr, Essex Police
Chief Inspector P.E. Russ, No.6 Region Driving School
Sergeant M.O. Trosh, Cert. Ed., Metropolitan Police
Inspector R. Wright, Wiltshire Constabulary
Acknowledgements for technical support and advice are
given to:-
Chief Inspector Andrew Bright, Scottish
Police College
Dr. Mark Dunne, Vision Sciences Department,
University of Aston
Superintendent D.J. Rowe, Department of
Transport
Dr. Gordon Sharp, in association with the Scottish Police
College
Back
to Top, and Contents
TERMS OF REFERENCE
(a) To develop a set of national core competencies for advanced
and standard driving in the light of developments in vehicle and
road design to enable ACPO (Personnel and Training) Committee to
construct an appropriate training package.
(b) To review police pursuit driver training.
Initially the Working Group were tasked with
developing core competencies for advanced drivers only, however, it was
felt that skills overlap significantly with those of standard drivers.
During the deliberations of the Working Group a wide
range of relevant issues were considered which impacted upon the terms
of reference. These issues have been divided into broad categories as
follows:-
-
training
-
operational
-
technology
-
administration
Back
to Top, and Contents
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The Service should take proper account of Health & Safety in
all areas of police driving activity, particularly in respect of the
provision of suitable 'control measures' (para 2.4).
2. All aspects of Health and Safety issues should be considered
equally applicable to driver training and operational activity (para
2.6).
3. Pursuits should be subject of vigorous control and only
undertaken by trained personnel. Individuals should only engage in
pursuits in suitably equipped vehicles and must continually consider
the consequences of the pursuit (para 2.7).
4. Individuals should only exercise legal driving exemptions, such
as exceeding the speed limit, if they have received the appropriate
driver training (para 2.10).
5. Risk assessments should identify areas of organisational and
individual responsibility. Assessments should be sufficiently flexible
to include local operating conditions, limitations and policies,
having special consideration for localised dangers or specialist
operational requirements (para 2.14)
6. Attitudinal training should be included in driver training
course structures. Representatives of Driving Schools' Conference and
National Police Training (NPT) should be tasked with defining detailed
competencies and course structure (para 3.10).
7. The book 'Human Aspects of Police Driving' by Doctor Gordon
Sharp in association with the Scottish Police College should be
required reading for police driving students (para 3.11).
8. Periodic formal assessment of driving skills should take place
between each 3-5 years. A return to driving duties, after 12 months
or more absence from a particular standard, should be accompanied by
an appropriate assessment and refresher training provided as necessary
(para 4.3).
9. Driver training should fulfil operational needs and as far as
practicable reflect the operational environment. The Working Group
therefore recommend driver training during the hours of darkness (para
5.2).
10. Driving Instructor training should be taken forward with a
National Instructors Course based on competencies appropriate to
driving instruction and receive recognition by way of a National
Vocational Qualification (paras 6.1 - 6.5).
11. Skill areas have been produced (Section 1) and it is
recommended, in accordance with the terms of reference, core
competencies are developed within each training package. It is further
recommended that identification of the core competencies is jointly
undertaken by qualified driving instructors, recognised by Driving
Schools Conference, and suitably qualified persons in the field of
education and training (para 6.7).
12. Driver training should be taken forward nationally with three
core courses (para 6.8):
Basic
Driving -
Training to fulfil a patrol function within the constraints of
the Highway Code.
Standard
Driving - Extending basic training to
include emergency response driving, night response driving and
most importantly, attitudinal training. A pragmatic
introduction to pursuit incidents and pursuit management in
line with standard level car control skills.
Advanced
Driving - Achieving
a high level of all round driver skills, enabling pursuits and
high speed response driving, as well as a full understanding
of the effects of attitude and associated stress.
13. Courses should be competency based and each competency should
have an identified minimum skill. It is appropriate that the
determination of course content and the identification of minimum
skill levels is undertaken by those responsible for the development of
core competencies (para 6.9).
14. Where it is anticipated that tactical surveillance driving skills
will be required during surveillance operations, it is recommended that
drivers will have successfully completed the NPT accredited surveillance
training course (para 6.11).
15. To achieve a commonality of approach driving instructor training
and more generally driver training will need to be subject of co-ordinated
national quality assurance procedures. It is recommended that all police
driver training establishments be accredited by NPT or similar
institution to ensure course standards are validated and verified (para
6.12).
16. Police Controllers and Air Support Staff should receive pursuit
management training, regular refresher training and ensure the training
takes a pragmatic hands on approach. Where Forces utilise dog handlers
to assist with resolution of pursuits they should be similarly trained (para
7.4).
17. All pursuits must be conducted in accordance with the nationally
agreed ACPO Pursuit Codes of Practice (paras 8.1 - 8.2).
18. It is recommended in order to keep pace with developments and
training, technology and understanding, the ACPO Pursuit Codes of
Practice are reviewed regularly to ensure the highest standards of
safety and effectiveness (para 8.6).
19. All police vehicles that engage in pursuits and emergency
response should be equipped with both sirens and emergency lights. Such
equipment will be used in all appropriate circumstances (paras 10.1 -
10.2).
20. Communication systems on vehicles being driven in pursuit and
emergency response circumstances should be capable of operation in
'hands free' mode (para 13.1).
21. Simulator technology is currently being evaluated to determine if
it is sufficiently realistic to provide improved training for police
drivers. This report recommends that ACPO consider the use of
sponsorship and the formulation of partnerships with industry or
universities, in conjunction with PSDB, to develop simulator technology
appropriate for police application (para 15.11).
22. All marked police vehicles (irrespective of whether the Force has an
Air Support unit) should have roof markings as recommended by the ACPO
Air Support Sub-Committee and the PSDB report "Standard Roof
Markings for Police Vehicles" (para 16.1).
23. The Service should pay particular attention to developments in
available warning systems and emergency lighting and as research
identifies improvements Forces should make best use of the technology (paras
16.3 - 16.5).
24. Current eye sight requirements for entry into the service have
been published in the Home Office circular 7/98 and Forces may wish to
consider these as a standard pre-requisite for driver training (para
17.3).
25. The correlation between types of visual impairment to driver
ability are not yet established. This report recommends that the
following tests of higher level perceptual function are further
evaluated (para 17.5):
UFOV (Useful Field of View) visual attention analyser.
DRTS (Drivers Reaction Time Simulator).
26. This report recommends the wide availability and early deployment
of vehicle stopping devices by trained officers. National standards
should apply to the training and application of such devices (paras
18.9 - 18.10).
27. Police and support staff control room operators should also
receive training as the use of this equipment requires their involvement
and understanding (para 18.11).
28. To assist future research and analysis the service through ACPO
should define universal categories of police vehicle accidents such as
those occurring during pursuits, emergency response and general patrol (para
19.2).
29. Police vehicle accidents resulting in death or life threatening
injury or where the circumstances may be a matter of public interest
have normally been voluntarily referred to the PCA under Section 87 PACE
Act 1984. Such openness is to be applauded and is recommended as good
practice (para 19.3).
30. Forces should be vigorous in the supervision and audit of police
vehicle accidents. Reports should be examined to determine driver
training needs, the suitability of vehicles used, the proper application
of policies and procedures to control risks and the effectiveness of
associated equipment such as sirens (para 19.5).
31. Notice should be taken of the document 'A Review of Serious
Accidents Involving Police Pursuits and Emergency Response 1993 - 1995',
ACPO Traffic Committee in consultation with the Police Complaints
Authority. Forces should ensure that its recommendations have been
considered for implementation (para 19.6).
32. Line managers should take a far greater responsibility for both
the supervision and development of driving skills which should be
reviewed through the annual appraisal system in the same way as any
other policing skills (para 20.4).
33. Forces should retain details of police drivers' accident history
within a system which enables high risk drivers to be identified for
review (para 20.6).
Back
to Top, and Contents
DEFINITIONS
During the course of the Working Group's
deliberation, considerable discussion took place concerning definitions,
in various existing reports, that were applied to the terms 'pursuits'
and 'follow'.
Some members felt that the existing definitions did
not necessarily reflect the pragmatics of everyday operational duty. It
was decided not to change existing definitions. It was accepted however,
following an incident, in reality it will be the 'media' and public who
will assess, from a common sense point of view, whether or not a
'pursuit' or 'follow' has taken place and whether or not a target
vehicle could be regarded as a 'fleeing' vehicle.
Existing definitions serve as a guide to officers and
should assist them in their assessment of any given situation which
could be described as a 'follow' or 'pursuit'. Operational situations
and circumstances are apt to change very swiftly and explicitly stated
definitions cannot always reflect 'real' life.
Pursuit
ACPO
'8: 'A police pursuit occurs when police attempt to stop
the driver of a motor vehicle and the driver refuses to obey the
officer, following which the police give chase for the purpose
of stopping the fleeing driver.'
Horner '95:
'A "pursuit" is where appropriately
trained officers, in suitable vehicles, pursue a fleeing vehicle
with the intention of safely causing it to stop.'
TPAC:
'A "pursuit" is where appropriately trained
officers, in suitable vehicles, pursue a "target"'
vehicle with the intention of safely causing it to stop."
'Target' is a vehicle subject of 'pursuit'.
Follow
Horner '95:
'A follow is not a pursuit. It is where a police
officer safely monitors the progress of a target vehicle, with
the objective of appropriately trained officers undertaking a
'"pursuit of that vehicle".'
TPAC
Tactical Pursuit and Containment is a strategy
designed to effectively combat motor vehicle pursuits. The
tactics require appropriately trained police personnel working
as a team to use their professional judgement and skill in
affecting an early resolution to a pursuit. The on road
tactics will only be undertaken by suitably trained police
officers who by the intelligent use of police vehicles,
emergency equipment and vehicle arresting devices cause the
target vehicle to stop with a minimum of risk to the public,
police and fleeing driver.
Primary Vehicle
This report defines 'primary
vehicle' as the first ground unit pursuing a fleeing vehicle,
however, whenever available and appropriate, the role or
aspects of the role of primary vehicle may be undertaken by an
air support unit.
Back
to Top, and Contents
INTRODUCTION
In October 1996, The Police Complaints Authority
requested a thorough review of police pursuit driver training. ACPO
(Personnel and Training) Committee appointed Mr. Rodney P. Lind,
Q.P.M., Deputy Chief Constable of Wiltshire Constabulary to chair the
Working Group. The membership comprised representatives from a cross
section of the police service including:-
ACPO (Personnel and Training)
Police Driving Schools' Conference
Police Driver Training Establishment
Tactical Pursuit and Containment Training
Senior Operational Traffic Management
Police Scientific Development Branch
The development of standards of police pursuit
driving have been most recently influenced by two specific documents:-
The Police Driving Report 1989
The Horner Report 1995
The Working Group have considered these documents in
detail and find that they are valid and largely reflect the needs of
current police driver training. Many of the recommendations of these
reports are still considered best practice, however, the Working Group
believe their implementation has in some instances fallen by the
wayside.
Research carried out by the Police Research Group (PRG)
in their report 'A Study Of Deaths and Serious Injuries Resulting From
Police Vehicle Accidents' impacts significantly on the terms of
reference of this report. The findings and recommendations advise
improvements in driver training and this report refers to the study as a
source document (further referred to as 'The PRG Study').
During their deliberations the Working Group gave
specific attention to developments in technology, the greater
understanding of driver attitudes and the implications of Health &
Safety legislation.
In recent years advanced police driver training has
moved forward. There is now far greater emphasis on safety and the
progressive development of driver skills. Drivers attitudes,
responsibilities and accountability to the public are key issues of
professionalism within current training. Training for the management and
undertaking of pursuits is available for police drivers. Drivers are
introduced to a variety of skills and the theme of team work is strongly
developed to safely resolve such incidents.
During pursuit situations there is a fundamental
acceptance of the value of air support, good radio communications and
the co-ordinating and managing role of supervisors and radio
controllers.
Containment procedures have been developed through
systems such as TPAC (Tactical Pursuit and Containment). The TPAC system
is recognised nationally and is seen as best practice. The vast majority
of Forces have adopted TPAC methods.
The development of core competencies expected for
advanced and standard drivers was included in the terms of reference.
The Working Group have identified key areas (Section 1) from which
competencies can be evolved to finalise detail and skill levels as part
of an appropriate national training package. It is envisaged that the
development of such a package will be undertaken by the National Police
Driving Schools Conference together with National Police Training (NPT).
Historically, therefore, progressive development of
driver training has sought to attain high professional standards. This
report seeks to build upon this effort by promoting national standards
of competency and instructor skills.
Section One - Training
1. Core Competencies For Pursuit and Emergency Response Driving
1.1 One of the key elements of this report was to identify all the
pertinent aspects of police driver training which will provide officers
with the ability to fulfil pursuit driving duties to a nationally
recognised standard. One model for police driving competencies has been
designed by the Metropolitan Police and the Working Group examined the
detail of their work which is a very extensive programme of
competencies.
1.2 The Working Group restricted itself to identify key areas of
skill where competency is required. The detailed development of those
competencies to ascertain levels of skill against required driving
standards has to be jointly undertaken by qualified driving instructors
and suitably qualified persons in the field of education and training.
It is therefore envisaged that core competencies can be drawn from the
skill areas identified below which will be developed into suitable
training packages by Driving Schools Conference and National Police
Training.
Table of Identified Skill Areas
1. Attitude
(a) Theory
A knowledge and understanding of 'Human Aspects of Police
Driving' in addition to and expanding upon chapter 1 of 'Roadcraft
The Police Drivers' Handbook'.
(b) Practical
Through training and driver record history able to display a
professional attitude toward safety, incorporating speed, risk
assessment and accidents.
(c) Decision Making
Have the ability to make decisions in a methodical way without
hesitation, based on what can be seen, what cannot be seen and what
can reasonably be expected to happen.
2. Fitness
(a) Mental
The ability of the individual to make a personal and honest ongoing
assessment in respect of:-
-
alertness;
-
fatigue;
-
stress;
-
emotional condition.
(b) Physical
To meet agreed levels of physical fitness appropriate to the role.
To meet the recommended level of eyesight.
3. Observation
(a) Visual
Observing the environment;
Assessment of visual information;
Hazard awareness and planning;
Adjusting driving plans accordingly.
(b) Audio
To meet the recommended level of hearing.
4. Co-ordination
The ability to co-ordinate mental and physical processes under
stress.
5. Roadcraft Skills
(a) An in-depth knowledge of the 'Roadcraft' manual and the
'Highway Code'.
(b) Fully conversant with the system of car control and its
application over the five phases.
(c) Vehicle handling skills as recommended by 'Roadcraft' in
respect of:
(d) A working knowledge of the effects on vehicle stability.
(e) The ability to execute all recommended skills to the agreed
standard during day or night time driving.
6. Operational Skills
(a) Use of sirens.
(b) Use of emergency lights.
(c) Use of communications equipment including:-
commentary;
radio management of a pursuit situation.
(d) Use of in car video.
7. Pursuit Tactics
(a) Use of air support and other support functions.
(b) TPAC containment procedures.
(c) Use of Hostyd (Hollow Spike Tyre Deflation System) type
devices.
(d) Other tactical techniques as determined by ACPO.
8. Vehicle Maintenance Skills
(a) Knowledge of vehicle capabilities.
(b) Basic maintenance.
9. Legislation
(a) A full working knowledge of road traffic legislation and in
particular legal driving exemptions in respect of pursuits and
emergency response.
(b) A full working knowledge of ACPO pursuit policy and codes of
practice.
(c) A full working knowledge of local Force policy in relation to
pursuits and emergency response.
(d) A working knowledge of Health and Safety legislation.
(e) An understanding of risk assessment.
(f) A full understanding of personal and Force liability.
(g) Issues of evidence and prosecution.
2. Health and Safety
2.1 The Police Health & Safety Act 1997 received royal assent on
21st March 1997 and, when implemented, will have the effect of applying
all provisions of the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 to police
officers, police cadets and special constables.
2.2 There are a number of managerial responsibilities emerging from
this legislative change which include:
-
ensuring Health & Safety arrangements are implemented in their
area of activity;
-
making suitable and sufficient risk assessments where personnel are
likely to be exposed to risk of injury to their health and safety;
-
carrying out inspections of work area and equipment;
-
ensuring accidents are investigated;
-
ensuring individual personnel are aware of their responsibilities
for Health & Safety;
-
ensuring personnel under their control are adequately trained,
informed, instructed and supervised;
-
ensuring those hazards they do not have the authority to correct
are reported to the appropriate level of management.
2.3 Whilst recognising the specific responsibilities of individual
Chief Constables and senior managers, it must be remembered that all
personnel have a responsibility for Health & Safety at work, and as
such have an important role to fulfil in the implementation and
application of the legislation. At its simplest, police pursuits are a
work activity. When a pursuit is undertaken there is a danger of an
accident occurring (the hazard). The potential for an accident occurring
during a pursuit is high (the risk). The new legislation requires Forces
to adopt measures (the control) to minimise the risk of a hazard
occurring whilst undertaking the work activity, i.e., to realise the
risk of an accident occurring whilst undertaking a pursuit.
2.4 Health & Safety, as it relates to the Police Service, has not
yet been enacted and there is limited previous case law to draw
conclusions from. If, however, Health & Safety legislation is looked
at more generally there are examples which indicate the seriousness with which the Courts view such matters. Legal opinion would
suggest that failure of the Service to take proper account of Health
& Safety legislation, particularly in respect of the provision of
suitable 'control measures' would undoubtedly leave Forces, and perhaps
individuals, open to litigation.
2.5 Joint Home Office/ACPO Guidance (Volume III) A Guide on Risk
Assessment, incorporates a generic risk assessment on mobile patrol
which includes reference to vehicle pursuit activity. This element of a
risk assessment has been considered by the Working Group and developed
in line with the experiences of members.
2.6 All aspects of Health & Safety issues apply equally to all
driver training and operational activity.
2.7 Vehicle pursuits have been proven to be a high risk activity,
attracting intense public and media interest, particularly when injuries
are caused. However, it is the view of the Working Group that pursuit
activity is an inevitable aspect of policing which will continue to
occur. Pursuits should be subject to vigorous control and only
undertaken by trained personnel. Individuals should only engage in
pursuits in suitably equipped vehicles and must continually consider the
consequences of the pursuit.
2.8 What is or is not a suitable vehicle is a matter for individual
Chief Constables. The types of considerations will include whether the
vehicle is operating in urban or rural areas, the number of vehicles
available and the prevailing conditions. The underlying proviso is that
the activity should not exceed the capability of the driver or the
vehicle or a combination of both.
2.9 The Working Group consider that the Police Service has a
fundamental duty to equip its staff with skills, through training, to
successfully and safely undertake those operational driving tasks which
the individual might reasonably expect to face.
2.10 Whilst a vehicle being used for police purposes entitles the
driver to certain legal driving exemptions, such as exceeding the speed
limit, the individual should only exercise those exemptions if they have
received the appropriate level of driver training.
2.11 The successful conclusion of appropriate training would enable
an officer to be proficient in all required skills and would include the
ability to make a ‘continual risk assessment’ as a pursuit
progressed and to make appropriate decisions to reflect a changing
environment.
2.12 A structured Health & Safety approach is complementary to
existing ACPO policy on pursuits (Section Two - Operational: Pursuit
Management). It incorporates all aspects of pursuit training and
provides a considered structure for the operational framework.
2.13 A revised and enhanced risk assessment is included (Appendix).
This is not considered to be a definitive risk assessment as it cannot
take account of particular unique local features or all operations where
a pursuit may be a likely outcome. Operational managers are advised to
consider the Home Office ACPO assessment together with the revised risk
assessment (Appendix) when preparing their own assessments.
2.14 Localised dangers, such as an area demanding special operational
consideration, need to be incorporated, reinforcing the need for risk
assessments to be responsive and flexible. Risk assessments must be
completed by a competent person who would be expected to know and have
experience of the following:
--
the area
--
department or activity to be assessed (i.e. a detailed
understanding of the procedures)
--
shift patterns
--
local limitations (it would be unacceptable to refer to Air
Support or HOSTYDS if none
were ever likely to be available)
2.15 The revised risk assessment (Appendix) is focused on the
pursuit element and is not intended to minimise the importance of
other vehicle related risk assessments such as pre-patrol vehicle
checks, use of tyre deflation devices or TPAC tactics which should be
dealt with separately.
2.16 The Safety Representatives and Safety Committee Regulations
1977, plus the Health & Safety (Consultation with Employees)
Regulations 1996, provide a framework for consultation. The
regulations empower Trade Unions to appoint safety representatives to
represent them and require an employer to establish a safety
committee, if requested to do so by at least two safety
representatives. For the purposes of this legislation, when enacted,
(anticipated 1st June, 1998) Staff Associations will fulfil the role
of a Trade Union under the regulations. In order to meet the demands
of these regulations any proposed risk assessment should be subject to
consultation.
2.17 The application of a structured approach to the completion of
risk assessments in this highly sensitive area of police activity,
presents the service with an opportunity for critical appraisal of
pursuit activity and for positive action to maximise safety.
Back
to Top, and Contents
Recommendations
1. The Service should take proper account of Health & Safety in
all areas of police driving activity, particularly in respect of the
provision of suitable 'control measures' (para 2.4)
2. All aspects of Health and Safety issues should be considered
equally applicable to driver training and operational activity (para
2.6)
3. Pursuits should be subject of vigorous control and only undertaken
by trained personnel. Individuals should only engage in pursuits in
suitably equipped vehicles and must continually consider the
consequences of the pursuit (para 2.7)
4. Individuals should only exercise legal driving exemptions, such as
exceeding the speed limit, if they have received the appropriate driver
training (para 2.10)
5. Risk assessments should identify areas of organisational and
individual responsibility. Assessments should be sufficiently flexible
to include local operating conditions, limitations and policies, having
special consideration for localised dangers or specialist operational
requirements (para 2.14)
3. ATTITUDE
3.1 Professional driving relies on maintaining a positive
attitude which provides tolerance and consideration for other road
users. Drivers should be capable of a realistic appraisal of their
own abilities taking account of the prevailing driving environment
with an overriding responsibility for safety.
3.2 Stressful driving situations such as pursuits or emergency
response can induce negative attitudes and emotions which impair
driving performance by reducing information processing within the
brain. This results in increased reaction time and reduced
observational skills with an obvious risk to road safety.
3.3 It is recognised that the level of competence required to
suppress dangerous attitudes is not necessarily within the
capability of all police officers. Psychometric and psychological
testing of police driving students is an area currently being
considered by Forces and may become a component part of future
selection procedures.
3.4 These could be assessed using a set of computer based tests,
or incorporated within pre-planned scenarios on a driving simulator.
A low cost personal computer (PC) based simulator could be designed
specifically for this assessment, or various scenarios could be
programmed into a more realistic simulator, possibly comprising
vehicle cabin, sound and motion. The advantages of using a simulator
are that the selection tests would be directly recognisable as being
related to an officer's ability to perform tasks relevant to the
job. Potential examples include hazard perception, speed of reaction
to dynamic events in peripheral vision (more on this under Vision
Testing), ability to concentrate on the driving task despite an
assortment of distractions, and the potential for suffering from
dangerous attitudes when under pressure.
3.5 The 'Police Driving Report 1989' recognised research by the
Police Research Support Unit (PRSU) into driver attitudes and
recommended further investigations into this area which was found to
have an affect on driver behaviour. By including the work of Dr.
Robert West, the 1994 publication of the revised 'Roadcraft the
Police Drivers Handbook' introduced information on the affects
inappropriate attitudes can have on the police driver.
3.6 In recognising the importance of attitudinal training as a
key area of development in driver safety the Traffic Training
Division of the Scottish Police College engaged the expertise of
Doctor Gordon Sharp who, as a former head of the RAF Aviation
Medicine Training Centre at Farnborough, had amassed vast experience
in identifying and dealing with attitudinal problems affecting the
information processing and decision making ability of aircrew.
3.7 Driver error has been identified as the single most
blameworthy cause of injury accidents. Since the 1930s when advanced
driving courses were introduced, the incidents of police driver
accidents has reduced from one accident in every 8,000 miles
travelled to one accident in every 250,000 miles travelled (source
'Human Aspects of Police Driving'). Despite this dramatic reduction
the most significant cause of accidents remains driver error which
research closely links to driver attitude.
3.8 Dr. Sharp conducted research including 'on-board' studies of
police drivers operating under the pressures commonly found within
both operational and training environments and subsequently
developed in-depth training focusing on the problems and needs of
the police driver.
3.9 This work resulted in the attitudinal training package 'Mind
your Attitude' and subsequent publication of the book 'Human Aspects
of Police Driving'. The book deals comprehensively with the causes
and effects of negative attitudes and is written specifically for
the police officer. It provides information on the requirement and
ability of officers to cope with the variable and often extreme
pressure present within the complex environment of the police
vehicle.
3.10 Many police driving schools have already included
Dr. Sharp's attitude training package into their course
structure. This Working Group considers this an area of best
practice. It would seem appropriate, if representatives of Driving
Schools' Conference and National Police Training (NPT) are tasked
with defining detailed competencies and course structure, they
should include attitudinal training.
3.11 The Working Group acknowledge the benefits of enabling
officers to recognise and cope with the symptoms of stress induced
behaviour which will prepare them for the most demanding driving
situations. In consequence the Working Group recommend that 'Human
Aspects of Police Driving' should be required reading for students
to complement and expand on the content of 'Roadcraft the Police
Drivers' Handbook'.
Recommendations
6.
Attitudinal training should be included in driver
training course structures. Representatives of Driving Schools'
Conference and National Police Training (NPT) should be tasked
with defining detailed competencies and course structure (para
3.10).
7. The book 'Human
Aspects of Police Driving' by Dr. Gordon Sharp in association
with the Scottish Police College should be required reading for
police driving students (para 3.11).
Back
to Top, and Contents
4. Refresher Training
4.1 Health & Safety Legislation demands that skills are
reassessed regularly and where appropriate suitable refresher
training should be given.
4.2 Line managers are capable of taking a greater role in
relation to the supervision and development of driving skills. It is
recognised that the bulk of police supervisors may not have any
particular aptitude or skill as driver trainers, however, as police
officers they are expected to be capable of identifying poor
driving. Sergeants and Inspectors should take a positive role in
identifying and dealing with driving weaknesses in their
subordinates. In essence they are able to identify incidents of poor
driving, recklessness or cavalier attitude. This may highlight the
need for reassessment and where appropriate the provision of
refresher training.
4.3 Driving skills as with any other skills may deteriorate over
time or with lack of use. This is particularly evident with more
advanced skills. It is evident therefore that where enhanced skills
are required as part of daily or periodic use those skills will
require regular assessment and refresher training. It is recommended
that such periodic assessments should take place between each 3 - 5
years. A return to driving duties, after 12 months or more absence
from a particular standard should be accompanied by an appropriate
assessment and refresher training provided as necessary.
Recommendation
8. Periodic formal assessment of driving skills should take place
between each 3 - 5 years.
A return to driving duties, after 12 months or more absence from a
particular standard should be accompanied by an appropriate assessment
and refresher training provided as necessary (para 4.3).
Back
to Top, and Contents
5. Night Time Driver Training
5.1 It is accepted that historically the Service has not
undertaken comprehensive training during the hours of darkness. Many
Forces now incorporate an element of night time training in their
courses. The 'PRG study' clearly shows the number of accidents that
occur during darkness, but it is not clear if there is a correlation
between accidents and levels of driver training.
5.2 A recent Police Scientific Development Branch (PSDB) survey
of driver training methods (Report on Police Driver Training, Swift
Research Ltd 1997) concluded that officers expressed mixed opinion
regarding the importance of night time driver training. The Working
Group, however, are of the view that driver training should fulfil
operational needs and as far as possible, reflect the operational
environment. The Working Group therefore recommend driver training
during the hours of darkness.
Recommendation
9. Driver training should fulfil operational needs and as far as
practicable reflect the operational environment. The Working Group
therefore recommend driver training during the hours of darkness (para
5.2).
6 Harmonised Driver Training
6.1 The Working Group acknowledge the comments made by the 'PRG
study' and has come to similar conclusions.
6.2 The Working Group is strongly of the opinion that to ensure
consistency and credibility of a national training package driving
instructors need to be accredited. It is recommended instructor
training be taken forward with a National Instructors Course. There
is a need to ensure that training is delivered to consistent
national standards. In essence to ensure a consistent standard of
police driving there needs to be a similarly consistent standard of
instruction and examination.
6.3 To achieve this it is suggested that driving instructors
acquire a vocational qualification. The acquisition of that
qualification should follow a structure of driver training similar
to that adopted by the Trainer Development Programme of NPT.
Competencies specific to Instructors should be identified and form
the basis of their training
This would allow present Instructors to collate evidence from
their workplace and through accreditation of prior learning have
their qualifications recognised to the agreed vocational
qualification.
6.4 The Working Group in recognition of this and developments
within the police service and NPT (e.g., Trainer Development
Programme) recommend that the above measures can best be achieved by
setting instructor competencies against appropriate selected units
such as level 3 training and development which is currently
available as a National Vocational Qualification within the police
environment.
6.5 It is recommended, competencies appropriate to driving
instruction are considered and form the basis for instructor
qualifications and therefore maintain instructional standards for
current and future police driver training. If the proposed strategy
for unifying instructional standards is accepted then it is
envisaged that NPT and the Driving Schools' Conference would be able
to construct a suitable qualification and training course.
6.6 The Working Group undertook a survey of all Forces to
determine the content of driving courses and competencies. It was
clear there are a number of different training strategies throughout
the country. For instance, there was a great disparity between
course content, length, instructor/student ratio, teaching and
assessment methods. The conclusions of the Working Group are also
reflected in the findings of the survey undertaken by PSDB and
published by Swift Research Ltd. Replies to the Working Group survey
were varied in depth but a number of individual Force documents were
received and taken into consideration.
6.7 Drawing upon this evidence the Working Group considered the
skill areas (Section 1) applicable to the development of core
competencies, in accordance with the terms of reference. The Working
Group determined that the identification of the core competencies
should be jointly undertaken by qualified driving instructors,
recognised by Driving Schools Conference and suitably qualified
persons in the field of education and training.
6.8 It is recommended that driver training be taken forward
nationally with three core courses. These courses represent three
unique standards of driving.
Basic
-
Training to fulfil a patrol function within the constraints
of the Highway Code.
Standard - Extending basic training to
include emergency response driving, night response driving
and most importantly, attitudinal training. A pragmatic
introduction to pursuit incidents and pursuit management in
line with standard level car control skills.
Advanced - Achieving a high
level of all round driver skills, enabling pursuits and high
speed response driving, as well as a full understanding of
the effects of attitude and associated stress.
6.9 Each course will comprise a number of competencies and each
competency should have an identified minimum skill level appropriate
to the particular course. It is appropriate that the determination
of course content and the identification of minimum skill levels is
undertaken by those responsible for the development of core
competencies.
6.10 Once the three core courses and their individual
competencies are established, Forces requiring supplementary driving
skills can incorporate additional training to complement, such as
defensive VIP or TPAC training.
6.11 Health and Safety legislation makes it clear that training
should be provided which adequately reflects the task demanded of an
officer. Where it is anticipated, therefore, that tactical
surveillance driving skills will be required, during surveillance
operations, it is recommended that drivers will have successfully
completed the NPT accredited surveillance driving course.
6.12 To achieve a commonality of approach, as stated, driving
instructor training will need to be addressed. More generally,
driver training will need to be subject to co-ordinated national
quality assurance procedures. To help to achieve this, it is
recommended that all police driver training establishments be
accredited by NPT or other similar institution to ensure course
standards are validated and verified.
Recommendations
10. Driving Instructor training should be taken forward with a
National Instructors Course based on competencies appropriate to
driving instruction and receive recognition by way of a National
Vocational Qualification (paras 6.1 - 6.5).
11. Skill areas have been produced (Section 1) and it is
recommended, in accordance with the terms of reference, core
competencies are developed within each training package. It is further
recommended that identification of the core competencies is jointly
undertaken by qualified driving instructors, recognised by Driving
Schools Conference, and suitably qualified persons in the field of
education and training (para 6.7).
12. Driver training should be taken forward nationally with three
core courses (para 6.8):
Basic - Training to fulfil a patrol function within
the constraints of the Highway Code.
Standard - Extending basic training to
include emergency response driving, night response driving and
most importantly, attitudinal training. A pragmatic
introduction to pursuit incidents and pursuit management in
line with standard level car control skills.
Advanced - Achieving a high
level of all round driver skills, enabling pursuits and high
speed response driving, as well as a full understanding of the
effects of attitude and associated stress.
13. Courses should be competency based and each competency should
have an identified minimum skill. It is appropriate that the
determination of course content and the identification of minimum
skill levels is undertaken by those responsible for the development of
core competencies (para 6.9).
14. Where is it anticipated that tactical surveillance driving
skills will be required, during surveillance deployment involving
vehicles, it is recommended that drivers will have successfully
complet |