Police Pursuit Driver Training

 

 

All website contents copyright ©,  'Drive and Stay Alive', 2003, unless specified otherwise. All rights reserved.

 

 

IMPORTANT: click here to read the DISCLAIMER


 

 

 

Report of the Working Group of the UK Association of Chief Police Officers 

(Personnel and Training) 

Committee

into

Pursuit Driver Training

 

September 1998

 

 

 

Contents

 

Foreword by Deputy Chief Constable 

 

Working Party Membership 

 

Terms of Reference 

 

Recommendations

Definitions 

 

Report

 

Introduction 

 

 

Section One - Training

 

1. Core Competencies 

2. Health and Safety 

3. Attitude 

4. Refresher Training 

5. Night Time Driver Training 

6. Harmonised Driver Training 

 

 

Section Two - Operational

7.   Controllers

8.   Pursuit Management 

9.   Containment Procedures

10. Use of Sirens and Lights

11. Use of In-Car Video

12. Alcohol

13. Communication

14. Mobile Phones

 

 

Section Three - Technology

15. Simulators

16. Vehicle Conspicuity

17. Vision Testing

18. Stopping Devices

Section Four - Administration

19. Management of Police Vehicle Accidents

20. Management of Drivers

Appendix

 

Revised Risk Assessment

 

Bibliography

 


Foreword

 

There is an expectation from the [British] public that its Police Service will demonstrate the highest of standards when its Officers discharge their duties. No clearer example of this can there be than the use of Police vehicles to detect and apprehend offenders.

 

The Police vehicle is a very important tool for use by Officers to fulfill their duty and inevitably there are occasions when these vehicles must be driven at high speeds and in a manner requiring skills which far exceed those of the general motorist. The most emotive of such occasions is pursuit but skilled driving is also expected during the normal course of patrol when a Police driver can be called upon to respond urgently to an incident.

 

Whatever the reason it is essential an Officer is competent and skilled to drive a Police vehicle to exacting standards. This can only be achieved through relevant and properly designed training. The key must be to train officers to a standard of professionalism which enables them to make precise judgements about their own ability and correct use of the Police vehicle, thereby minimising risk to the public.

 

I am grateful to members of the Working Group for their ideas and contributions in preparing this report. In particular, their commitment to emphasising the importance of road safety, attitudinal training, eyesight standards and taking maximum advantage of technological advances.

 

It is crucial that members of the Police Service accept the importance being placed on improving their driving skills and attitudes and I hope this will also serve to reassure the public of the commitment by the Police Service to maintaining the highest driving standards on our roads.

 

Rodney Lind

Back to Top, and Contents


 

WORKING GROUP MEMBERSHIP

 

Chair

Mr. R. P. LIND, Q.P.M., Wiltshire Constabulary

Deputy Chief Constable

 

Members

Inspector R. Edwards, Surrey Police

Inspector C.R. Elliott (Retired), Metropolitan Police

Miss L. Head, BSc (Hons), PSDB Sandridge

Sergeant C.J. Hill, Wiltshire Constabulary

Supt T. Hubbard (Retired), Humberside Police

Supt D.J.C. McBirney, BA (Hons), Thames Valley Police

Supt D.J. McGarr, Essex Police

Chief Inspector P.E. Russ, No.6 Region Driving School

Sergeant M.O. Trosh, Cert. Ed., Metropolitan Police

Inspector R. Wright, Wiltshire Constabulary

 

 

Acknowledgements for technical support and advice are given to:-

Chief Inspector Andrew Bright, Scottish Police College

Dr. Mark Dunne, Vision Sciences Department, University of Aston

    Superintendent D.J. Rowe, Department of Transport

Dr. Gordon Sharp, in association with the Scottish Police College

Back to Top, and Contents


 

TERMS OF REFERENCE

(a) To develop a set of national core competencies for advanced and standard driving in the light of developments in vehicle and road design to enable ACPO (Personnel and Training) Committee to construct an appropriate training package.

 

(b) To review police pursuit driver training.

Initially the Working Group were tasked with developing core competencies for advanced drivers only, however, it was felt that skills overlap significantly with those of standard drivers.

 

During the deliberations of the Working Group a wide range of relevant issues were considered which impacted upon the terms of reference. These issues have been divided into broad categories as follows:-

  • training

  • operational

  • technology

  • administration

Back to Top, and Contents


RECOMMENDATIONS

 

1. The Service should take proper account of Health & Safety in all areas of police driving activity, particularly in respect of the provision of suitable 'control measures' (para 2.4).

 

2. All aspects of Health and Safety issues should be considered equally applicable to driver training and operational activity (para 2.6).

 

3. Pursuits should be subject of vigorous control and only undertaken by trained personnel. Individuals should only engage in pursuits in suitably equipped vehicles and must continually consider the consequences of the pursuit (para 2.7).

 

4. Individuals should only exercise legal driving exemptions, such as exceeding the speed limit, if they have received the appropriate driver training (para 2.10).

 

5. Risk assessments should identify areas of organisational and individual responsibility. Assessments should be sufficiently flexible to include local operating conditions, limitations and policies, having special consideration for localised dangers or specialist operational requirements (para 2.14)

 

6. Attitudinal training should be included in driver training course structures. Representatives of Driving Schools' Conference and National Police Training (NPT) should be tasked with defining detailed competencies and course structure (para 3.10).

 

7. The book 'Human Aspects of Police Driving' by Doctor Gordon Sharp in association with the Scottish Police College should be required reading for police driving students (para 3.11).

 

8. Periodic formal assessment of driving skills should take place between each 3-5 years. A return to driving duties, after 12 months or more absence from a particular standard, should be accompanied by an appropriate assessment and refresher training provided as necessary (para 4.3).

 

9. Driver training should fulfil operational needs and as far as practicable reflect the operational environment. The Working Group therefore recommend driver training during the hours of darkness (para 5.2).

 

10. Driving Instructor training should be taken forward with a National Instructors Course based on competencies appropriate to driving instruction and receive recognition by way of a National Vocational Qualification (paras 6.1 - 6.5).

 

11. Skill areas have been produced (Section 1) and it is recommended, in accordance with the terms of reference, core competencies are developed within each training package. It is further recommended that identification of the core competencies is jointly undertaken by qualified driving instructors, recognised by Driving Schools Conference, and suitably qualified persons in the field of education and training (para 6.7).

 

12. Driver training should be taken forward nationally with three core courses (para 6.8):

Basic Driving - Training to fulfil a patrol function within the constraints of the Highway Code.

 

Standard Driving - Extending basic training to include emergency response driving, night response driving and most importantly, attitudinal training. A pragmatic introduction to pursuit incidents and pursuit management in line with standard level car control skills.

 

Advanced Driving - Achieving a high level of all round driver skills, enabling pursuits and high speed response driving, as well as a full understanding of the effects of attitude and associated stress.

13. Courses should be competency based and each competency should have an identified minimum skill. It is appropriate that the determination of course content and the identification of minimum skill levels is undertaken by those responsible for the development of core competencies (para 6.9).

 

14. Where it is anticipated that tactical surveillance driving skills will be required during surveillance operations, it is recommended that drivers will have successfully completed the NPT accredited surveillance training course (para 6.11).

 

15. To achieve a commonality of approach driving instructor training and more generally driver training will need to be subject of co-ordinated national quality assurance procedures. It is recommended that all police driver training establishments be accredited by NPT or similar institution to ensure course standards are validated and verified (para 6.12).

 

16. Police Controllers and Air Support Staff should receive pursuit management training, regular refresher training and ensure the training takes a pragmatic hands on approach. Where Forces utilise dog handlers to assist with resolution of pursuits they should be similarly trained (para 7.4).

 

17. All pursuits must be conducted in accordance with the nationally agreed ACPO Pursuit Codes of Practice (paras 8.1 - 8.2).

 

18. It is recommended in order to keep pace with developments and training, technology and understanding, the ACPO Pursuit Codes of Practice are reviewed regularly to ensure the highest standards of safety and effectiveness (para 8.6).

 

19. All police vehicles that engage in pursuits and emergency response should be equipped with both sirens and emergency lights. Such equipment will be used in all appropriate circumstances (paras 10.1 - 10.2).

 

20. Communication systems on vehicles being driven in pursuit and emergency response circumstances should be capable of operation in 'hands free' mode (para 13.1).

 

21. Simulator technology is currently being evaluated to determine if it is sufficiently realistic to provide improved training for police drivers. This report recommends that ACPO consider the use of sponsorship and the formulation of partnerships with industry or universities, in conjunction with PSDB, to develop simulator technology appropriate for police application (para 15.11).

 

22. All marked police vehicles (irrespective of whether the Force has an Air Support unit) should have roof markings as recommended by the ACPO Air Support Sub-Committee and the PSDB report "Standard Roof Markings for Police Vehicles" (para 16.1).

 

23. The Service should pay particular attention to developments in available warning systems and emergency lighting and as research identifies improvements Forces should make best use of the technology (paras 16.3 - 16.5).

 

24. Current eye sight requirements for entry into the service have been published in the Home Office circular 7/98 and Forces may wish to consider these as a standard pre-requisite for driver training (para 17.3).

 

25. The correlation between types of visual impairment to driver ability are not yet established. This report recommends that the following tests of higher level perceptual function are further evaluated (para 17.5):

UFOV (Useful Field of View) visual attention analyser.

DRTS (Drivers Reaction Time Simulator).

 

26. This report recommends the wide availability and early deployment of vehicle stopping devices by trained officers. National standards should apply to the training and application of such devices (paras 18.9 - 18.10).

 

27. Police and support staff control room operators should also receive training as the use of this equipment requires their involvement and understanding (para 18.11).

 

28. To assist future research and analysis the service through ACPO should define universal categories of police vehicle accidents such as those occurring during pursuits, emergency response and general patrol (para 19.2).

 

29. Police vehicle accidents resulting in death or life threatening injury or where the circumstances may be a matter of public interest have normally been voluntarily referred to the PCA under Section 87 PACE Act 1984. Such openness is to be applauded and is recommended as good practice (para 19.3).

 

30. Forces should be vigorous in the supervision and audit of police vehicle accidents. Reports should be examined to determine driver training needs, the suitability of vehicles used, the proper application of policies and procedures to control risks and the effectiveness of associated equipment such as sirens (para 19.5).

 

31. Notice should be taken of the document 'A Review of Serious Accidents Involving Police Pursuits and Emergency Response 1993 - 1995', ACPO Traffic Committee in consultation with the Police Complaints Authority. Forces should ensure that its recommendations have been considered for implementation (para 19.6).

 

32. Line managers should take a far greater responsibility for both the supervision and development of driving skills which should be reviewed through the annual appraisal system in the same way as any other policing skills (para 20.4).

 

33. Forces should retain details of police drivers' accident history within a system which enables high risk drivers to be identified for review (para 20.6).

 

Back to Top, and Contents


 

DEFINITIONS

During the course of the Working Group's deliberation, considerable discussion took place concerning definitions, in various existing reports, that were applied to the terms 'pursuits' and 'follow'.

 

Some members felt that the existing definitions did not necessarily reflect the pragmatics of everyday operational duty. It was decided not to change existing definitions. It was accepted however, following an incident, in reality it will be the 'media' and public who will assess, from a common sense point of view, whether or not a 'pursuit' or 'follow' has taken place and whether or not a target vehicle could be regarded as a 'fleeing' vehicle.

 

Existing definitions serve as a guide to officers and should assist them in their assessment of any given situation which could be described as a 'follow' or 'pursuit'. Operational situations and circumstances are apt to change very swiftly and explicitly stated definitions cannot always reflect 'real' life.

Pursuit

 

ACPO '8:      'A police pursuit occurs when police attempt to stop the driver of a motor vehicle and the driver refuses to obey the officer, following which the police give chase for the purpose of stopping the fleeing driver.'

 

Horner '95:  'A "pursuit" is where appropriately trained officers, in suitable vehicles, pursue a fleeing vehicle with the intention of safely causing it to stop.'

 

TPAC:         'A "pursuit" is where appropriately trained officers, in suitable vehicles, pursue a "target"' vehicle with the intention of safely causing it to stop."

                 'Target' is a vehicle subject of 'pursuit'.

 

 

Follow

Horner '95:  'A follow is not a pursuit. It is where a police officer safely monitors the progress of a target vehicle, with the objective of appropriately trained officers undertaking a '"pursuit of that vehicle".'

 

 

TPAC  

 

Tactical Pursuit and Containment is a strategy designed to effectively combat motor vehicle pursuits. The tactics require appropriately trained police personnel working as a team to use their professional judgement and skill in affecting an early resolution to a pursuit. The on road tactics will only be undertaken by suitably trained police officers who by the intelligent use of police vehicles, emergency equipment and vehicle arresting devices cause the target vehicle to stop with a minimum of risk to the public, police and fleeing driver.

 

 

Primary Vehicle  

 

This report defines 'primary vehicle' as the first ground unit pursuing a fleeing vehicle, however, whenever available and appropriate, the role or aspects of the role of primary vehicle may be undertaken by an air support unit.

Back to Top, and Contents


 

INTRODUCTION

 

In October 1996, The Police Complaints Authority requested a thorough review of police pursuit driver training. ACPO (Personnel and Training) Committee appointed Mr. Rodney P. Lind, Q.P.M., Deputy Chief Constable of Wiltshire Constabulary to chair the Working Group. The membership comprised representatives from a cross section of the police service including:-

ACPO (Personnel and Training)

Police Driving Schools' Conference

Police Driver Training Establishment

Tactical Pursuit and Containment Training

Senior Operational Traffic Management

Police Scientific Development Branch

 

The development of standards of police pursuit driving have been most recently influenced by two specific documents:-

The Police Driving Report 1989

The Horner Report 1995

 

The Working Group have considered these documents in detail and find that they are valid and largely reflect the needs of current police driver training. Many of the recommendations of these reports are still considered best practice, however, the Working Group believe their implementation has in some instances fallen by the wayside.

 

Research carried out by the Police Research Group (PRG) in their report 'A Study Of Deaths and Serious Injuries Resulting From Police Vehicle Accidents' impacts significantly on the terms of reference of this report. The findings and recommendations advise improvements in driver training and this report refers to the study as a source document (further referred to as 'The PRG Study').

 

During their deliberations the Working Group gave specific attention to developments in technology, the greater understanding of driver attitudes and the implications of Health & Safety legislation.

 

In recent years advanced police driver training has moved forward. There is now far greater emphasis on safety and the progressive development of driver skills. Drivers attitudes, responsibilities and accountability to the public are key issues of professionalism within current training. Training for the management and undertaking of pursuits is available for police drivers. Drivers are introduced to a variety of skills and the theme of team work is strongly developed to safely resolve such incidents.

 

During pursuit situations there is a fundamental acceptance of the value of air support, good radio communications and the co-ordinating and managing role of supervisors and radio controllers.

 

Containment procedures have been developed through systems such as TPAC (Tactical Pursuit and Containment). The TPAC system is recognised nationally and is seen as best practice. The vast majority of Forces have adopted TPAC methods.

 

The development of core competencies expected for advanced and standard drivers was included in the terms of reference. The Working Group have identified key areas (Section 1) from which competencies can be evolved to finalise detail and skill levels as part of an appropriate national training package. It is envisaged that the development of such a package will be undertaken by the National Police Driving Schools Conference together with National Police Training (NPT).

 

Historically, therefore, progressive development of driver training has sought to attain high professional standards. This report seeks to build upon this effort by promoting national standards of competency and instructor skills.

 


Section One - Training

 

1. Core Competencies For Pursuit and Emergency Response Driving

1.1 One of the key elements of this report was to identify all the pertinent aspects of police driver training which will provide officers with the ability to fulfil pursuit driving duties to a nationally recognised standard. One model for police driving competencies has been designed by the Metropolitan Police and the Working Group examined the detail of their work which is a very extensive programme of competencies.

 

1.2 The Working Group restricted itself to identify key areas of skill where competency is required. The detailed development of those competencies to ascertain levels of skill against required driving standards has to be jointly undertaken by qualified driving instructors and suitably qualified persons in the field of education and training. It is therefore envisaged that core competencies can be drawn from the skill areas identified below which will be developed into suitable training packages by Driving Schools Conference and National Police Training.

 

 

Table of Identified Skill Areas

 

1. Attitude

 

(a) Theory

A knowledge and understanding of 'Human Aspects of Police Driving' in addition to and expanding upon chapter 1 of 'Roadcraft The Police Drivers' Handbook'.

 

(b) Practical

Through training and driver record history able to display a professional attitude toward safety, incorporating speed, risk assessment and accidents.

 

(c) Decision Making

Have the ability to make decisions in a methodical way without hesitation, based on what can be seen, what cannot be seen and what can reasonably be expected to happen.

 

2. Fitness

(a) Mental

The ability of the individual to make a personal and honest ongoing assessment in respect of:-

  • alertness;

  • fatigue;

  • stress;

  • emotional condition.

 

(b) Physical

To meet agreed levels of physical fitness appropriate to the role.

To meet the recommended level of eyesight.

 

 

3. Observation

 

(a) Visual

Observing the environment;

Assessment of visual information;

Hazard awareness and planning;

Adjusting driving plans accordingly.

 

(b) Audio

To meet the recommended level of hearing.

 

 

4. Co-ordination

 

The ability to co-ordinate mental and physical processes under stress.

 

 

5. Roadcraft Skills

 

(a) An in-depth knowledge of the 'Roadcraft' manual and the 'Highway Code'.

(b) Fully conversant with the system of car control and its application over the five phases.

(c) Vehicle handling skills as recommended by 'Roadcraft' in respect of:

  • acceleration, using gears, braking and steering;

  • skidding;

  • drivers signals;

  • positioning;

  • cornering;

  • overtaking;

  • motorway driving;

  • speed and safety.

  • (d) A working knowledge of the effects on vehicle stability.

    (e) The ability to execute all recommended skills to the agreed standard during day or night time driving.

     

     

     

    6. Operational Skills

     

    (a) Use of sirens.

    (b) Use of emergency lights.

    (c) Use of communications equipment including:-

  • commentary;

  • radio management of a pursuit situation.

(d) Use of in car video.

 

 

7. Pursuit Tactics

 

(a) Use of air support and other support functions.

(b) TPAC containment procedures.

(c) Use of Hostyd (Hollow Spike Tyre Deflation System) type devices.

(d) Other tactical techniques as determined by ACPO.

 

 

8. Vehicle Maintenance Skills

 

(a) Knowledge of vehicle capabilities.

(b) Basic maintenance.

 

 

9. Legislation

 

(a) A full working knowledge of road traffic legislation and in particular legal driving exemptions in respect of pursuits and emergency response.

 

(b) A full working knowledge of ACPO pursuit policy and codes of practice.

 

(c) A full working knowledge of local Force policy in relation to pursuits and emergency response.

 

(d) A working knowledge of Health and Safety legislation.

 

(e) An understanding of risk assessment.

 

(f) A full understanding of personal and Force liability.

 

(g) Issues of evidence and prosecution.

 


 

2. Health and Safety

 

2.1 The Police Health & Safety Act 1997 received royal assent on 21st March 1997 and, when implemented, will have the effect of applying all provisions of the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 to police officers, police cadets and special constables.

 

2.2 There are a number of managerial responsibilities emerging from this legislative change which include:

  • ensuring Health & Safety arrangements are implemented in their area of activity;

  • making suitable and sufficient risk assessments where personnel are likely to be exposed to risk of injury to their health and safety;

  • carrying out inspections of work area and equipment;

  • ensuring accidents are investigated;

  • ensuring individual personnel are aware of their responsibilities for Health & Safety;

  • ensuring personnel under their control are adequately trained, informed, instructed and supervised;

  • ensuring those hazards they do not have the authority to correct are reported to the appropriate level of management.

 

2.3 Whilst recognising the specific responsibilities of individual Chief Constables and senior managers, it must be remembered that all personnel have a responsibility for Health & Safety at work, and as such have an important role to fulfil in the implementation and application of the legislation. At its simplest, police pursuits are a work activity. When a pursuit is undertaken there is a danger of an accident occurring (the hazard). The potential for an accident occurring during a pursuit is high (the risk). The new legislation requires Forces to adopt measures (the control) to minimise the risk of a hazard occurring whilst undertaking the work activity, i.e., to realise the risk of an accident occurring whilst undertaking a pursuit.

 

2.4 Health & Safety, as it relates to the Police Service, has not yet been enacted and there is limited previous case law to draw conclusions from. If, however, Health & Safety legislation is looked at more generally there are examples which indicate the seriousness with which the Courts view such matters. Legal opinion would suggest that failure of the Service to take proper account of Health & Safety legislation, particularly in respect of the provision of suitable 'control measures' would undoubtedly leave Forces, and perhaps individuals, open to litigation.

 

2.5 Joint Home Office/ACPO Guidance (Volume III) A Guide on Risk Assessment, incorporates a generic risk assessment on mobile patrol which includes reference to vehicle pursuit activity. This element of a risk assessment has been considered by the Working Group and developed in line with the experiences of members.

 

2.6 All aspects of Health & Safety issues apply equally to all driver training and operational activity.

 

2.7 Vehicle pursuits have been proven to be a high risk activity, attracting intense public and media interest, particularly when injuries are caused. However, it is the view of the Working Group that pursuit activity is an inevitable aspect of policing which will continue to occur. Pursuits should be subject to vigorous control and only undertaken by trained personnel. Individuals should only engage in pursuits in suitably equipped vehicles and must continually consider the consequences of the pursuit.

 

2.8 What is or is not a suitable vehicle is a matter for individual Chief Constables. The types of considerations will include whether the vehicle is operating in urban or rural areas, the number of vehicles available and the prevailing conditions. The underlying proviso is that the activity should not exceed the capability of the driver or the vehicle or a combination of both.

 

2.9 The Working Group consider that the Police Service has a fundamental duty to equip its staff with skills, through training, to successfully and safely undertake those operational driving tasks which the individual might reasonably expect to face.

2.10 Whilst a vehicle being used for police purposes entitles the driver to certain legal driving exemptions, such as exceeding the speed limit, the individual should only exercise those exemptions if they have received the appropriate level of driver training.

 

2.11 The successful conclusion of appropriate training would enable an officer to be proficient in all required skills and would include the ability to make a ‘continual risk assessment’ as a pursuit progressed and to make appropriate decisions to reflect a changing environment.

 

2.12 A structured Health & Safety approach is complementary to existing ACPO policy on pursuits (Section Two - Operational: Pursuit Management). It incorporates all aspects of pursuit training and provides a considered structure for the operational framework.

 

2.13 A revised and enhanced risk assessment is included (Appendix). This is not considered to be a definitive risk assessment as it cannot take account of particular unique local features or all operations where a pursuit may be a likely outcome. Operational managers are advised to consider the Home Office ACPO assessment together with the revised risk assessment (Appendix) when preparing their own assessments.

 

2.14 Localised dangers, such as an area demanding special operational consideration, need to be incorporated, reinforcing the need for risk assessments to be responsive and flexible. Risk assessments must be completed by a competent person who would be expected to know and have experience of the following:

 -- the area

 -- department or activity to be assessed (i.e. a detailed understanding of the procedures)

 -- shift patterns

 -- local limitations (it would be unacceptable to refer to Air Support or HOSTYDS if none

     were ever likely to be available)

 

2.15 The revised risk assessment (Appendix) is focused on the pursuit element and is not intended to minimise the importance of other vehicle related risk assessments such as pre-patrol vehicle checks, use of tyre deflation devices or TPAC tactics which should be dealt with separately.

 

2.16 The Safety Representatives and Safety Committee Regulations 1977, plus the Health & Safety (Consultation with Employees) Regulations 1996, provide a framework for consultation. The regulations empower Trade Unions to appoint safety representatives to represent them and require an employer to establish a safety committee, if requested to do so by at least two safety representatives. For the purposes of this legislation, when enacted, (anticipated 1st June, 1998) Staff Associations will fulfil the role of a Trade Union under the regulations. In order to meet the demands of these regulations any proposed risk assessment should be subject to consultation.

 

2.17 The application of a structured approach to the completion of risk assessments in this highly sensitive area of police activity, presents the service with an opportunity for critical appraisal of pursuit activity and for positive action to maximise safety.

 

Back to Top, and Contents


 

 

Recommendations

 

1. The Service should take proper account of Health & Safety in all areas of police driving activity, particularly in respect of the provision of suitable 'control measures' (para 2.4)

 

2. All aspects of Health and Safety issues should be considered equally applicable to driver training and operational activity (para 2.6)

 

3. Pursuits should be subject of vigorous control and only undertaken by trained personnel. Individuals should only engage in pursuits in suitably equipped vehicles and must continually consider the consequences of the pursuit (para 2.7)

 

4. Individuals should only exercise legal driving exemptions, such as exceeding the speed limit, if they have received the appropriate driver training (para 2.10)

 

5. Risk assessments should identify areas of organisational and individual responsibility. Assessments should be sufficiently flexible to include local operating conditions, limitations and policies, having special consideration for localised dangers or specialist operational requirements (para 2.14)

 

 

3. ATTITUDE

3.1 Professional driving relies on maintaining a positive attitude which provides tolerance and consideration for other road users. Drivers should be capable of a realistic appraisal of their own abilities taking account of the prevailing driving environment with an overriding responsibility for safety.

 

3.2 Stressful driving situations such as pursuits or emergency response can induce negative attitudes and emotions which impair driving performance by reducing information processing within the brain. This results in increased reaction time and reduced observational skills with an obvious risk to road safety.

 

3.3 It is recognised that the level of competence required to suppress dangerous attitudes is not necessarily within the capability of all police officers. Psychometric and psychological testing of police driving students is an area currently being considered by Forces and may become a component part of future selection procedures.

 

3.4 These could be assessed using a set of computer based tests, or incorporated within pre-planned scenarios on a driving simulator. A low cost personal computer (PC) based simulator could be designed specifically for this assessment, or various scenarios could be programmed into a more realistic simulator, possibly comprising vehicle cabin, sound and motion. The advantages of using a simulator are that the selection tests would be directly recognisable as being related to an officer's ability to perform tasks relevant to the job. Potential examples include hazard perception, speed of reaction to dynamic events in peripheral vision (more on this under Vision Testing), ability to concentrate on the driving task despite an assortment of distractions, and the potential for suffering from dangerous attitudes when under pressure.

 

3.5 The 'Police Driving Report 1989' recognised research by the Police Research Support Unit (PRSU) into driver attitudes and recommended further investigations into this area which was found to have an affect on driver behaviour. By including the work of Dr. Robert West, the 1994 publication of the revised 'Roadcraft the Police Drivers Handbook' introduced information on the affects inappropriate attitudes can have on the police driver.

 

3.6 In recognising the importance of attitudinal training as a key area of development in driver safety the Traffic Training Division of the Scottish Police College engaged the expertise of Doctor Gordon Sharp who, as a former head of the RAF Aviation Medicine Training Centre at Farnborough, had amassed vast experience in identifying and dealing with attitudinal problems affecting the information processing and decision making ability of aircrew.

 

3.7 Driver error has been identified as the single most blameworthy cause of injury accidents. Since the 1930s when advanced driving courses were introduced, the incidents of police driver accidents has reduced from one accident in every 8,000 miles travelled to one accident in every 250,000 miles travelled (source 'Human Aspects of Police Driving'). Despite this dramatic reduction the most significant cause of accidents remains driver error which research closely links to driver attitude.

 

3.8 Dr. Sharp conducted research including 'on-board' studies of police drivers operating under the pressures commonly found within both operational and training environments and subsequently developed in-depth training focusing on the problems and needs of the police driver.

 

3.9 This work resulted in the attitudinal training package 'Mind your Attitude' and subsequent publication of the book 'Human Aspects of Police Driving'. The book deals comprehensively with the causes and effects of negative attitudes and is written specifically for the police officer. It provides information on the requirement and ability of officers to cope with the variable and often extreme pressure present within the complex environment of the police vehicle.

 

3.10 Many police driving schools have already included Dr. Sharp's attitude training package into their course structure. This Working Group considers this an area of best practice. It would seem appropriate, if representatives of Driving Schools' Conference and National Police Training (NPT) are tasked with defining detailed competencies and course structure, they should include attitudinal training.

 

3.11 The Working Group acknowledge the benefits of enabling officers to recognise and cope with the symptoms of stress induced behaviour which will prepare them for the most demanding driving situations. In consequence the Working Group recommend that 'Human Aspects of Police Driving' should be required reading for students to complement and expand on the content of 'Roadcraft the Police Drivers' Handbook'.

 

 

 

Recommendations

 

6. Attitudinal training should be included in driver training course structures. Representatives of Driving Schools' Conference and National Police Training (NPT) should be tasked with defining detailed competencies and course structure (para 3.10).

 

7. The book 'Human Aspects of Police Driving' by Dr. Gordon Sharp in association with the Scottish Police College should be required reading for police driving students (para 3.11).

Back to Top, and Contents

 

 

 

4. Refresher Training

4.1 Health & Safety Legislation demands that skills are reassessed regularly and where appropriate suitable refresher training should be given.

 

4.2 Line managers are capable of taking a greater role in relation to the supervision and development of driving skills. It is recognised that the bulk of police supervisors may not have any particular aptitude or skill as driver trainers, however, as police officers they are expected to be capable of identifying poor driving. Sergeants and Inspectors should take a positive role in identifying and dealing with driving weaknesses in their subordinates. In essence they are able to identify incidents of poor driving, recklessness or cavalier attitude. This may highlight the need for reassessment and where appropriate the provision of refresher training.

 

4.3 Driving skills as with any other skills may deteriorate over time or with lack of use. This is particularly evident with more advanced skills. It is evident therefore that where enhanced skills are required as part of daily or periodic use those skills will require regular assessment and refresher training. It is recommended that such periodic assessments should take place between each 3 - 5 years. A return to driving duties, after 12 months or more absence from a particular standard should be accompanied by an appropriate assessment and refresher training provided as necessary.

 

 

Recommendation

 

8. Periodic formal assessment of driving skills should take place between each 3 - 5 years. A return to driving duties, after 12 months or more absence from a particular standard should be accompanied by an appropriate assessment and refresher training provided as necessary (para 4.3).

 

Back to Top, and Contents

 

5. Night Time Driver Training

5.1 It is accepted that historically the Service has not undertaken comprehensive training during the hours of darkness. Many Forces now incorporate an element of night time training in their courses. The 'PRG study' clearly shows the number of accidents that occur during darkness, but it is not clear if there is a correlation between accidents and levels of driver training.

 

5.2 A recent Police Scientific Development Branch (PSDB) survey of driver training methods (Report on Police Driver Training, Swift Research Ltd 1997) concluded that officers expressed mixed opinion regarding the importance of night time driver training. The Working Group, however, are of the view that driver training should fulfil operational needs and as far as possible, reflect the operational environment. The Working Group therefore recommend driver training during the hours of darkness.

 

 

Recommendation

 

9. Driver training should fulfil operational needs and as far as practicable reflect the operational environment. The Working Group therefore recommend driver training during the hours of darkness (para 5.2).

 

 

6 Harmonised Driver Training

6.1 The Working Group acknowledge the comments made by the 'PRG study' and has come to similar conclusions.

 

6.2 The Working Group is strongly of the opinion that to ensure consistency and credibility of a national training package driving instructors need to be accredited. It is recommended instructor training be taken forward with a National Instructors Course. There is a need to ensure that training is delivered to consistent national standards. In essence to ensure a consistent standard of police driving there needs to be a similarly consistent standard of instruction and examination.

 

6.3 To achieve this it is suggested that driving instructors acquire a vocational qualification. The acquisition of that qualification should follow a structure of driver training similar to that adopted by the Trainer Development Programme of NPT. Competencies specific to Instructors should be identified and form the basis of their training

This would allow present Instructors to collate evidence from their workplace and through accreditation of prior learning have their qualifications recognised to the agreed vocational qualification.

 

6.4 The Working Group in recognition of this and developments within the police service and NPT (e.g., Trainer Development Programme) recommend that the above measures can best be achieved by setting instructor competencies against appropriate selected units such as level 3 training and development which is currently available as a National Vocational Qualification within the police environment.

 

6.5 It is recommended, competencies appropriate to driving instruction are considered and form the basis for instructor qualifications and therefore maintain instructional standards for current and future police driver training. If the proposed strategy for unifying instructional standards is accepted then it is envisaged that NPT and the Driving Schools' Conference would be able to construct a suitable qualification and training course.

 

6.6 The Working Group undertook a survey of all Forces to determine the content of driving courses and competencies. It was clear there are a number of different training strategies throughout the country. For instance, there was a great disparity between course content, length, instructor/student ratio, teaching and assessment methods. The conclusions of the Working Group are also reflected in the findings of the survey undertaken by PSDB and published by Swift Research Ltd. Replies to the Working Group survey were varied in depth but a number of individual Force documents were received and taken into consideration.

 

6.7 Drawing upon this evidence the Working Group considered the skill areas (Section 1) applicable to the development of core competencies, in accordance with the terms of reference. The Working Group determined that the identification of the core competencies should be jointly undertaken by qualified driving instructors, recognised by Driving Schools Conference and suitably qualified persons in the field of education and training.

6.8 It is recommended that driver training be taken forward nationally with three core courses. These courses represent three unique standards of driving.

Basic - Training to fulfil a patrol function within the constraints of the Highway Code.

 

Standard - Extending basic training to include emergency response driving, night response driving and most importantly, attitudinal training. A pragmatic introduction to pursuit incidents and pursuit management in line with standard level car control skills.

 

Advanced -  Achieving a high level of all round driver skills, enabling pursuits and high speed response driving, as well as a full understanding of the effects of attitude and associated stress.

 

6.9 Each course will comprise a number of competencies and each competency should have an identified minimum skill level appropriate to the particular course. It is appropriate that the determination of course content and the identification of minimum skill levels is undertaken by those responsible for the development of core competencies.

 

6.10 Once the three core courses and their individual competencies are established, Forces requiring supplementary driving skills can incorporate additional training to complement, such as defensive VIP or TPAC training.

 

6.11 Health and Safety legislation makes it clear that training should be provided which adequately reflects the task demanded of an officer. Where it is anticipated, therefore, that tactical surveillance driving skills will be required, during surveillance operations, it is recommended that drivers will have successfully completed the NPT accredited surveillance driving course.

 

6.12 To achieve a commonality of approach, as stated, driving instructor training will need to be addressed. More generally, driver training will need to be subject to co-ordinated national quality assurance procedures. To help to achieve this, it is recommended that all police driver training establishments be accredited by NPT or other similar institution to ensure course standards are validated and verified.

 

 

Recommendations

 

10. Driving Instructor training should be taken forward with a National Instructors Course based on competencies appropriate to driving instruction and receive recognition by way of a National Vocational Qualification (paras 6.1 - 6.5).

 

11. Skill areas have been produced (Section 1) and it is recommended, in accordance with the terms of reference, core competencies are developed within each training package. It is further recommended that identification of the core competencies is jointly undertaken by qualified driving instructors, recognised by Driving Schools Conference, and suitably qualified persons in the field of education and training (para 6.7).

 

12. Driver training should be taken forward nationally with three core courses (para 6.8):

Basic  - Training to fulfil a patrol function within the constraints of the Highway Code.

 

Standard - Extending basic training to include emergency response driving, night response driving and most importantly, attitudinal training. A pragmatic introduction to pursuit incidents and pursuit management in line with standard level car control skills.

 

Advanced  - Achieving a high level of all round driver skills, enabling pursuits and high speed response driving, as well as a full understanding of the effects of attitude and associated stress.

 

13. Courses should be competency based and each competency should have an identified minimum skill. It is appropriate that the determination of course content and the identification of minimum skill levels is undertaken by those responsible for the development of core competencies (para 6.9).

 

14. Where is it anticipated that tactical surveillance driving skills will be required, during surveillance deployment involving vehicles, it is recommended that drivers will have successfully complet